Two referees on the same courtand one shared standard
In futsal there are two referees with equal authority, one on each touchline, each deciding over their own zone. Nextaur gathers the round's incidents and lets you do two things with them: an activity where each referee decides first and which marks itself, or a presentation with the criteria already explained, ready for the technical session. Either way the incident and its explanation stay together.
Where a shared standard is hardest to reach
These are not the spectacular ones. They are the ones that come back every round, where two referees can land in different places without either of them breaking the Laws.
Accumulated fouls and the second penalty mark
- What is argued about
- Less «was it a foul?» and more «does this one count?». Only those punished with a direct free kick add up, and in RFEF competitions, from 2026/27, cautions to the bench for dissent count too.
- Why the Laws are not enough
- The consequence arrives late. A slightly more permissive threshold in the fifth minute decides the match in the thirtieth, when the sixth foul turns any offence into a clear chance with no wall.
- What it would take
- An activity with many fouls from the start of the period, decided blind and then compared against the committee's verdict. The count is easy to keep when the threshold is the same.
- What is argued about
- Less «was it a foul?» and more «does this one count?». Only those punished with a direct free kick add up, and in RFEF competitions, from 2026/27, cautions to the bench for dissent count too.
- Why the Laws are not enough
- The consequence arrives late. A slightly more permissive threshold in the fifth minute decides the match in the thirtieth, when the sixth foul turns any offence into a clear chance with no wall.
- What it would take
- An activity with many fouls from the start of the period, decided blind and then compared against the committee's verdict. The count is easy to keep when the threshold is the same.
There is also a reason eleven-a-side football does not have. With two referees of equal authority, a different standard does not produce a disagreement between rounds: it produces two refereeings inside the same match, depending on which zone the incident falls in.
From the round to the technical session
The cycle already exists: the circular in August, the pre-season technical session, weekly appointments and the observer's report. What changes is the material the standard comes from.
- 1
The round ends
Matches are played at weekends and midweek, and the same referee often takes more than one on the same day. The incidents worth reviewing come from several matches and several officiating teams. They go up and stay in one place, with competition, minute and incident type.
- 2
You choose what you need
Two paths, same incidents: an activity, if you want everyone to decide and to measure the result; or a presentation, if what is needed is to explain the criteria.
- 3
The activity: everyone decides first
They see the incident without the decision and answer from wherever they are. The verdict and its reasoning come afterwards. Repeated over many incidents of the same type, it is what brings the two referees' thresholds together.
- 4
The presentation: the criteria, explained
You select the incidents, order them and add the explanation. It runs in the technical session or goes out to whichever category you choose.
- 5
The standard stays with the incident
Not in the memory of whoever gave the talk. Three months later you go back to it and it still says the same thing, which is exactly what a written circular does not achieve with timing or with contact.
- 6
And it builds up across the season
Who gets what right, which type of incident the whole group misses, and how each referee progresses.
Futsal vocabulary, not football's
Decision and sanction are not marketing copy: they come from the product's own catalogue, the same one you pick from inside the platform.
- Decision
- 10-meter free kick
- Sanction
- Yellow card
- Explanation
- The defender stops the attack with a reckless challenge outside the area, with no chance of playing the ball. It is the team's sixth accumulated foul of the period, so it is no longer an ordinary free kick: a second penalty mark from ten metres, with no wall, and a caution for the recklessness.
And if you also prepare the matches?
The same stored incidents serve the coaching staff: select, order and build the next opposition report with them. What changes is what you do with the video, not where you keep it.
Build it with this round's incidents
Start with this week's session. There is no archive to migrate and nothing to prepare beforehand.